Most people think questions are just a way to get answers. But if that’s how you’re using them in your negotiations, you’re missing the point—and probably losing the deal or relationship.
In my early law enforcement days, we leaned hard on Calibrated Questions™ to dig for intelligence. “What’s the problem?” “How did you happen to be there?” “What did you do next?” That kind of stuff. It worked—until it didn’t. Multiple questions in a relatively short period of time with a person under the influence of negative emotions and dynamics will back fire. Defense go up as you are now a part of their threatening environment.
You’ve probably felt it before. Someone hits you with a direct question and your brain goes straight to: Why are they asking me that? What are they really after? How much should I say without putting myself in a corner? That hesitation? That guardedness? That’s the enemy of Tactical Empathy®.
So, we evolved our approach at The Black Swan Group.
Thought-Shaping Beats Fact-Finding
Now, when I want raw data, I go with an Asking Label™; a Label with an upward, inquisitive inflection. But when I want to move someone into a critical thinking or problem-solving mindset—that’s when I drop a Calibrated Question™. It’s not about uncovering facts. It’s about shaping thoughts.
What and how questions are our go-to. Why? Because they force the other side to think. They create the illusion of control while you hold the steering wheel. They’re Socratic in nature. Instead of answering a direct question from a student, he would respond with a question, forcing them to think and arrive at the conclusion themselves.
Calibrated Questions™ and Tone
This isn’t just a linguistic trick. It’s a tone thing too. You’ve got to deliver them with a curious…sometimes plaintiff tone. It should convey interest in learning as opposed to a cross-examination. Come in too hard or too fast, and it’ll feel like an interrogation. Soft, thoughtful, patient—that’s what earns the response you need.
The goal is to guide, not corner. You want to create a mental sandbox where your counterpart feels safe enough to build with you. That’s how you create the conditions for collaboration without saying, “Let’s collaborate.”
Here’s the secret. Every what and how question is designed. You built the sandbox. You defined the parameters. But because it’s open-ended, your counterpart feels free to play in it however they like.
That’s why I say Calibrated Questions™ are for shaping—not interrogating.
Implementation and Influence
One of the most strategic uses of a Calibrated Question™ is implementation. Ask someone, “How am I supposed to do that?” and watch what happens. You’re not saying no. You’re not giving in. You’re shaping the conversation toward feasibility, without breaking rapport.
You don’t even need them to answer the question directly. The question triggers a shift. They move from pushing an idea to evaluating its practicality. That shift is gold.
Likewise, when you have reached an agreement, that agreement needs to be tested multiple times before the interaction terminates. What and how questions influence the counterpart into providing viable next steps, maximizing chances for follow through.
This is how you give them the illusion of control while you control the frame.
Final Thought
If you're asking questions just to get answers, you're thinking too small. A Calibrated Question™ isn’t about what you want to know—it’s about where you want them to go.
If you want better results, start asking questions that guide thought, invite reflection, and create shared ownership. Ask in a way that lets them see the problem—and the solution—as theirs.
When they see it as their idea, they’ll run through walls to make it happen.